Can We Rely on Opinion Polls to Assess Public Service Performance?

Over the past few months, various polling and research companies have been sharing their findings on how various government officials have been ranked by their constituents in terms of performance.

The results have elicited mixed reactions, with those ranked the best considering the polls a true reflection of the voice of the people, while those ranked lowest often label the polls as mere fraud, tainted by corruption and political agenda. Questions on the credibility of these polls arise.

It\’s important to acknowledge that opinion polls worldwide are frequently used to influence political conversations. Thus, it\’s crucial to recognize the political influence that often surrounds polling from the onset.

Secondly, what parameters do these companies use to rank individuals? In most cases, these companies collect input from constituents. While public opinion is crucial for social development, it\’s essential to consider additional criteria such as evaluating implemented projects and the contributions of leaders in policy formulation and other objective areas.

Ideally, research should serve as a monitoring and evaluation tool. Consequently, the findings of these polls should provide the public with SMART insights to facilitate the identification of strengths and weaknesses in each individual.

The practice of ranking public servants solely based on popularity isn\’t inherently valuable. Politicians can employ tactics like issuing handouts and other strategies to gain popularity among constituents, which doesn\’t necessarily equate to effective service delivery.

Research should aim to be objective and minimize personal bias. The appropriate term is \”professional.\” It should provide a clear and unbiased picture of what is transpiring in a complex environment.

Allegedly, some politicians pay research firms to secure favorable rankings, while others do not. Regardless, the focus should shift away from this history, and we should strive to be professionals and hardworking citizens committed to providing the truth that benefits all.

Let\’s enhance our research on the performance of public servants by providing substantive credit and criticism. This approach will improve service delivery and citizen participation, ultimately fostering more development and opportunities for all.

For feedback and inquiries, please email us at

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


0 Responses

  1. Good one, l prefer wide public participation in such researches to get meaningful conclusion rather than relying on PR

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Latest Post